i think i now better understand your point, but you are getting confused a bit.

Great, immediately to insults.

engels is not a direct realist he is a diamatist.

The two are not mutually exclusive categories.

yes, engels declares matter and motion as ideas, but your confusion comes from an idealist understanding of ideas themselves

Again, more insults.

for marxists the human observes the world directly and then creates ideas, but this ideas are not nuomenal, they are just another representation of matter in the form of thougth.

Where the hell did I ever imply ideas are noumenal?????

it would be something like this. we perceive motion, we create the idea of motion, then we take into practice (with the material world) this idea of motion to deepen our understanding of it.

poo poo pee pee 1 + 1 = 2 the sky is blue

You are saying the most trivial stuff possible and pretending like you're somehow proving I'm some sort of confused moron. This entire post is dripping with vitriol and complete lack of respect for my intelligence. You are not engaging in any of my large collection of lengthy articles and just hurling insults while repeating obvious things off of the top of your head to "own" me.

That was as far as I could be bothered to read. Just blocking and moving on. I am sorry I ever bothered to try and talk to you.