How are you going to compare humans' usage to the usage of the thing that they are using?

Yes I've heard a lot of great things about that one. I just prefer a normal microphone because it feels better to use for me.

I would recommend against buying any gaming headphones. I bought the Steelseries Arctis Pro Wireless for $330 and a year later regretted it so much because I could have bought a pair of audiophile headphones that would have been more comfortable and given me much better audio quality and directional sound, and a separate microphone that would have been better for the same price.

I'm saying that the big corporations have such a strong foothold that I personally don't think we will ever be able to properly regulate them when they can pay off all of the politicians. I'm not trying to be a doomer, those are just my beliefs.

I agree. I don't think screen time limits are adequate.

I wish we had a job market where you wouldn't feel like you can't express your values because you could just go work at a competitor if you got fired for it.

Alright I understand your perspective now and agree.

You don't need to know how to use social media to set up the Apple parental controls that put time restrictions on certain apps.

I don't understand how it correlates. The article isn't saying that children of parents who use social media are more likely to be addicted to social media, it's saying that parental controls aren't helping stop social media addiction in children. So how does that smoker analogy make sense?

That analogy makes no sense for this situation.

Any of the privacy related ones. It's a very important topic to me so I like to read about it and discuss with like minded people.

Rules for thee not for me.