ReadMoreBooks

joined 6 days ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Rich people's property.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Property real and imaginary, lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

If the existence is a terroristic act how do you call farmers who breed these creatures on purpose?

Capitalists.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (4 children)

They protect and serve property.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

You know what I've noticed? Nobody panics when things go "according to plan" even if the plan is horrifying. If, tomorrow, I tell the press that a gang-banger will get shot or a truckload of soldiers will be blown up, nobody panics because "it's all part of the plan". But murder one little old CEO and everyone loses their minds!

[–] [email protected] 82 points 2 days ago (1 children)

1970

We're in danger of producing an educated prolitariat. That's dynamite! We have to be selective on who we allow to go through (higher education)

  • Roger Freeman, professor of economics and advisor to President Reagan

Denial of education will leave many perceiving violence as the only practical means of change.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

I had an uncle like you. He was one of my favorites :)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Our mass media can incite fear of chickens, pigs, and cattle. Then their existence itself can be defined as a terrorist act. We'll redefine vegan to mean only those that eat terrorists to save the other animals. Actual vegans can call themselves "vegetablers". Nothing changes and everyone feels good because if they don't feel good then they're not human.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I made a poor assumption that the children didn't understand that you were joking. I apologize.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (4 children)

They're growing up fast now days. Careful with that. They'll not forget.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Objective: To evaluate the cognitive abilities of the leading large language models and identify their susceptibility to cognitive impairment, using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and additional tests.

Results: ChatGPT 4o achieved the highest score on the MoCA test (26/30), followed by ChatGPT 4 and Claude (25/30), with Gemini 1.0 scoring lowest (16/30). All large language models showed poor performance in visuospatial/executive tasks. Gemini models failed at the delayed recall task. Only ChatGPT 4o succeeded in the incongruent stage of the Stroop test.

Conclusions: With the exception of ChatGPT 4o, almost all large language models subjected to the MoCA test showed signs of mild cognitive impairment. Moreover, as in humans, age is a key determinant of cognitive decline: “older” chatbots, like older patients, tend to perform worse on the MoCA test. These findings challenge the assumption that artificial intelligence will soon replace human doctors, as the cognitive impairment evident in leading chatbots may affect their reliability in medical diagnostics and undermine patients’ confidence.

view more: next ›