this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
124 points (93.7% liked)

linuxmemes

20815 readers
674 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

systemd is a FANTASTIC set of tools, well integrated into the environment, and allows powerful configurations to be set very easily. Anybody arguing for the "old ways" has never had to set up a complex network environment using an interfaces file and a million other configuration tools.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

The debate isn't even funny anymore, it ended completely IMO when Debian decided on systemd, despite heavy propaganda with wild promises about how amazing they planned to make upstart. Promises that were never gonna happen, and some of the problems they promised to solve, had been left unsolved by upstart developers for years. Some of them allegedly because they were basically impossible to solve in upstart, because the basic design concept is flawed, just like other init systems based on the System V legacy.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I love how well received pipewire was/is compared to the drama systemd and Wayland got.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

That's because all the audio drama focused on PulseAudio.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Don't even mention anything about Nvidia. Basically it's just a call for an infinite flamewar between everyone and one guy

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Who in the Linux community would say anything positive about NVIDIA?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hardware is pretty awesome. Everything else, no so much.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah because they refuse to work with the open source community lol. Don’t care how great their stuff is if they’re borderline openly hostile towards Linux.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Back before AMD Radeon Open Source drivers became good, the best options were widely considered to be Intel for Open Source that worked, or Nvidia for performance with proprietary drivers. AMD was basically considered the worst option you could choose.

Personally I have always used AMD anyway since 2005 on Linux, but that's because I'm a somewhat extreme political user, and I don't like Nvidia for multiple reasons. My wife however uses Nvidia, because she was less stubborn, and AMD worked poorly when she tried it.

IMO AMD is the way superior choice on Linux today.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I don't get why so many find it OK to tie their development to 1 vendor? I suspect CUDA will die off in favor of a more open and flexible option.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't tell if you're saying Wayland + Nvidia is da bomb, or Wayland + Nvidia will fuck your system up.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From my experience with Nvidia, it's both.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Weirdly enough, I've never been happier with Linux since I discovered Wayland with Fedora. I'm one year on my Linux journey at this point, my desktop never felt so polished. It actually feels like a competitor to Windows and MacOS now (at least for me) and yes, I use NVIDIA under Wayland

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

But Linus said something funny ten years ago, that means it's 100% true for everyone forever!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And that said one guy is actually an alt account of someone who was banned a long time ago, so the guy is literally evading a ban, and yet Michael is doing jack shit about it. Guess it works on his end as it is "hurr durr interaction".

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I have tried several times to find a convincing answer as to why systemd bad hur dur, but I could never find one that says precisely why. I'd love it if someone could ELI5 it for me.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What ive heard is the "linux philosophy" argument. Its just doing too many things.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

this comment shows how the word of mouth actually distorted the argument

its not the linux philosophy but one sentence of the unix philosophy (linux is not unix)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_philosophy

Make each program do one thing well. To do a new job, build afresh rather than complicate old programs by adding new "features"

besides being over 40 years old at this point

fun fact the linux kernel would actually not really fit this since it is an monolithic kernel

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Ah sorry, unix not linux. I didnt think of that before, it seems so obvious that linux kernel isnt doing one thing well, it does everything ever, kind of well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

because it's not 90's shell script thus it's bloat. What is your difficulty with understanding it? /s

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I had that attitude for a while but as I got used to it yeah, it's easily superior. I wouldn't go back.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Basically every tech publication. In Germany heise.de is the largest publication, usually with very interesting and balanced, but the comments are deliberately hidden away. They are a place where the worst of the internet lives apparently.