174
Shun every single J6er to the end of their days. If the court cannot judge them, then the responsibility falls to the citizens.
The court can’t do shit and the citizens have been responsible for the horrors of that nation since they elected Trump. We’d all love to assume those people will be shunned by their communities but their communities support them. It’s the communities that need judgement and justice.
A big problem with our system is that when laws are bent or broken by the right; the liberal response is to "follow the rules" but condemn. The office and powers of the president are being respected despite the fact that he is an openly corrupt criminal using the position for his own personal benefit.
The hope is that by "maintaining order" the system will self repair. But I think we're past the point that any reasonable person should believe that will happen. If you disagree, engage in a thought experiment with me. Image we "maintain order and follow the rules" and our next president is AOC. AOC decides to use the same powers of the presidency to
- Arrest and prosecute the crimes of Trump and his administration
- Arrest and prosecute those that were connected to Epstein
- Arrest CEOs that profited from mass social murders related to healthcare and environmental destruction.
Assume she does nothing more "outside the rules" than Trump does now. Will the Republicans in Congress or the Supreme Court sit back and "follow the rules" but condemn? I think we all know the answer to that.
There is no reason to maintain this charade of a democratic process right now. That needs to be seized back. But no judge or politician is singly willing to standup and risk being removed or imprisoned. This is because they know, that the Democrats will side with the Republicans in order to maintain "order".
So, we have a system that doesn't work to prosecute Republicans that break the rules; and at the same time, have one that still functions to prosecute anyone that attempts to resist the rule breaking. If this judge decided he's not going to honor the powers of the president, he would be removed. And he would be removed in a bipartisan way too.
The system is only functioning to make sure anyone that resists the fascist is removed. And the Democratic parties obsession with "following process" is allowing and empowering it.
“The government thus asks to absolve these Defendants of crimes against the United States itself,” Mehta wrote. “In this court’s view, that is not in the public interest.”
When you put it that way, pardoning these people almost sounds treasonous.
Add it to the pile
Great, we can burn it for warmth once the skies are choked with smoke
So the US justice department has motioned to stop prosecution. Is this a wink wink from Trump that they can do it all again next presidential election?
That and worse.
These THUGS better NOT do it AGAIN! OTHERWISE the Incoming Democrat President will ENSURE they do NO TIME because that would be TOO POLITICAL!
It is with great honor to announce that my first act as President will be to pardon everyone in connection with the January 6, 2021 protest. I will also extend that pardon to everyone in the previous administration under President Trump. As the President it is my duty to help this country heal by not holding anyone responsible for their actions. We will not investigate or do anything about how we can prevent such open, blatant corruption. To expose such actions will prevent future Presidents as myself from indulging in corruption.
President Gavin Newsom
"Time to move on".
Just want to let everyone know the dipshit in the picture accidentally shot himself in the face while attempting to be 'security' for a drug deal in the 90s.
Also, he wears the eyepatch because he got tired of cleaning his glass eye, and the socket got badly infected.
Fuck Stewart Rhodes, right where you shouldn't.
“Slams”, v.: Writes a strongly worded letter to people who either don’t care or can’t read.
Is SLAMMED back on the menu??
Moons Over MySlammy
slams
They should all aspire to be more like successfully reformed J6er Matthew Huttle.
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
174 points (99.4% liked)
politics
30740 readers
2565 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS