-1
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Like 75% of the candidates are cheating, and it's so obvious. It's a shame because even if I know they're cheating, it raises my subconscious bar on quality I expect from candidates.

"Oh I see you used Kafka in this design, but it appears to be pushing to your workers. Can you talk to me in a bit more detail about how this works?"

(note: You're only getting this question if you used Kafka to solve my problem. The answer is the workers pull off Kafka and store their own offset, or Kafka stores it in the case of consumer groups)

proceeds to read off the encyclopedia for Kafka

"that's great.. but explicitly, how are your workers using Kafka..?"

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

People do it because it works on average. Also, job requirements are usually entirely unrealistic, so obviously not a single honest person can apply. Even worse: Honest people are forced to lie to get a chance at all. Glad, freelancing works for me.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

Like, I'm sorry if you're not cheating in interviews, you're fucking yourself over.

If you're not the top person in your Ivy League class with a 5.7 GPA Being scouted by the big leagues in your field, then you should be cheating and doing everything you can to get every single advantage for yourself that you possibly can.

Otherwise the companies you're applying for are just going to fuck you over as hard as they believe they can get away with.

You may not like it, but that's capitalism, baby, and the sword of damocles cuts in both directions.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

A mirror. You might have need of one.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

On top of the other comments here about how capitalism is bad and coding interviews are generally bad, I wonder what your parameters are. Does the job description actually include your stack? Are you interviewing people who casually list JavaScript or python but don't have relevant coding experience? How much time is given and what is the extent of the question?

If you're not paying people for their time, and you're asking them to do an at home assignment that has potentially no relevance to their expertise or the job they will be doing, all within a short timeframe what do you expect?

Unpopular take, but I think a short practical question, or maybe some verbal pseudocode stuff is fine, but I've had to run interviews as well so I get the struggle of finding a good fit.

As an aside, I've known some good code monkeys that can't design or explain anything, but given a direction they will hammer out a mvp in record time. Sometimes you have to pick the right tool for the job. Good coders aren't always good designers and vice versa. That's my hot take for the day.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Just hire them. No "interview" needed.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

Imagine doing coding interviews but calling other people cringe.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Is this an interview over text? How is someone looking things up mid-way through a (phone? video?) conversation and expecting it not to be obvious that's what they're doing?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

They're using tools like Cluely

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
-1 points (45.5% liked)

General Programming Discussion

8729 readers
8 users here now

A general programming discussion community.

Rules:

  1. Be civil.
  2. Please start discussions that spark conversation

Other communities

Systems

Functional Programming

Also related

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS