12
Sounds like you are trying to setup a keylogger of sorts....
Not quite, PC gets hacked, on hacked machine someone does something like cd, but on that PC cd has been set up as an alias for some sort of command that downloads a malicious executable to the hackers machine and executed it.
That executable very well could be a keylogger, but doesn't necessarily have to be. It could be be rm -rf --no-preserve-root / or a reverse shell or whatever really.
I imagine cd would be a terrible choice to alias given how much it's used, but maybe something else more obscure could be used that is frequently used when bots/attackers are rummaging through files for stuff to steal.
I mean, I'm sure it's possible, it's just a matter of how to get the honeypot/script on the system and give the downloaded file executable rights.
Is there anything that is specific to ssh that would allow for this? Like a command that would allow something to execute back to the other machine similar to downloading? I'm not well versed just kind of a napkin idea I thought of.
you can't know what system architecture is on the ssh client side. It could be a mac, a windows or linux box, android or ios, beos, amigaos, etc.
So even if you could get ssh to pass malicious code how would you know what code to pass?
What you're asking for is nigh impossible i think.
And when you say "can't know" do you mean it would be impossible to tell strictly through SSH?
the ssh protocol doesn't provide any mechanism for your server to identity the client host architecture, nor does it provide any mechanism i'm aware of to send any payloads back to the host client for arbitrary execution.
The thing is ssh is a protocol and it's implementation is not going to be identical across clients.
So if you found a bug in an ssh client that allowed for this your hypothetical attack vector would only work on intruders using that broken client. ssh is one of the most scrutinized protocols there are and you should be a hero if you found this bug. what you're asking for, if it were as easy as you might hope, well ssh wouldn't be the ubiquitous security connection protocol if it were simple like that right?
Very true. Thanks for the education. SSH to me is just magic portal that lets me talk to my server in my closet lmao
it's a fun thought experiment as it's a very complex protocol
I kind of figured it would be a shot in the dark, some scripting could definitely be done to assess that, and even run code per major OS depending on some automated recon.
Let's say you've got that figured out, and the user is running putty on windows as an administrator. Is there anything that could take advantage of that fact?
I feel like this would be way easier/more feasible to run a script on your own machine as a defensive measure like OC mentioned early, but just more asking our of curiosity. I'm not skilled enough to even imagine what to do with this or write it, but I am fascinated by security stuff.
Something like this?
alias ls="who am i >> /var/log/intruder.log && logout"
alias l="/usr/bin/ls"
Partially for sure. Other part of this would be somehow executing a command on the attackers machine that originated as their own input, but they wouldn't be privy to that due to the alias.
I've seen some videos where people will willingly let scammers into their machine, and Honeypot them with a file that they execute, typically named like credit card info or bank info or something. But they knowingly click that and open it, I don't know what needs to be done on the "make this code execute on the attackers machine" part.
If someone is ssh'd into your machine, are there any escalated privileges you'd already have back to their machine because they've willingly come to yours?
Sounds illegal, though...
Should be whoami tho.
'whoami' and 'who am i' are two different things. Try it out.
Damn. TIL. knew about the first of course but who am i as three seperate pieces is new to me
this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
12 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
56487 readers
1047 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS