Fucking metal
this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
452 points (99.3% liked)
politics
23457 readers
2915 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Librarians when some maga chucklefuck demands to see the records
Well done, these guardians of knowledge are fighting a battle for history itself.
Jenkins!
Fuck yeah. Love this resistance to President Cheetos merry band of dipshits. And Capitol Police backing it up is even better. They answer to congress, not the fucking cheeto!
Librarians fucking rule.
They turned away unlawful access requests.
Not "New Bosses". They have not been legally appointed to the position. They are intruders posing as officials to gain unlawful access
Separation of powers - they literally can not be legally appointed by the executive.
I take issue with the title.
The term "new MAGA bosses" says "these ARE their new bosses and the staff aren't letting THEIR NEW BOSSES in"
Ajent Ornj doesn't have the authority to place these goons into the library of congress, therefore THEY ARE NOT BOSSES, new or otherwise. They are THUGS trying to break into a library after being told to leave, because they are there to ruin any positive thing there and burn half the contents. Figuratively or a literal bonfire, doesn't matter.
Suggested new title: LIBRARY OF CONGRESS STAFF TURN AWAY MAGA THUGS WHO CLAIM AUTHORITY WHERE NONE EXISTS
Wow, I didn’t have the Library of Congress pegged as the one government agency that would actually tell orangeboi et al to go fuck themselves. But I’m not disappointed that they are.
Intellectuals are usually the most willing to resist authoritarianism.
That's why they are usually one of the very early targets.
Libraries are more radical than skateboards, this is just how libraries be
Park rangers aren't taking this lying down either.
Disagree, sure there are occasional leaks but I can promise you that the leadership is moving forward quickly in following orders as they come down. There is no real resistance coming from the park service unfortunatly
These are the last people between the curated knowledge of the nation and fascists who want to burn it. And they know it.
Librarians are interesting folk. I’m not surprised.
My mom was a librarian and can confirm, librarians are weird badasses.
Freaky-deaky is a more accurate description.
In the best way!
Oh certainly.
Why couldn't other agencies do this? Almost none of the DOGE crap that's been done has been legal. So why did anybody listen to them at all?
some agencies have tried to fight back.
Library of Congress is not part of the executive branch so constitutionally speaking, they don't have new bosses unless Congress says so.
That being said, I could make the argument that DOGE is not a valid department and that all government employees should have resisted yet here we are.
In many of those cases, the building/department security sided with DOGE and physically forced the government employees to comply. There wasn't much they could do to resist without ending up assaulted and detained having accomplished nothing.
My biggest fear over the next few years is how many people who have chosen a career in "enforcement" are just salivating at the chance to be part of Team Nazi.
My biggest fear over the next few years is how many people who have chosen a career in "enforcement" are just salivating at the chance to be part of Team Nazi.
In a lot of enforcement industries it is not really a venn diagram, just two circles with just the tiniessssst bit of offset between them.
The people in that tiny sliver either quit or “accidentally” get shot in the back during a raid.
how many people who have chosen a career in "enforcement" are just salivating at the chance to be part of Team Nazi.
If it’s less than 99% …
librarians have been dealing with republicans trying to take full control of all libraries for many decades
I'm guessing librarians know how to read more than many other categories of federal workers.
There was one division that I saw go by that did, and was arrested. I'm guessing that they didn't expect this from librarians.
Who could have guessed a group of educated intellectuals would know the laws? Also. These assclowns are not officials. They were never confirmed by congress.
Push em back Push em back Waaaaay back!
This reminds me of the anime Library War...
Tell me more!
In broad strokes it kinda works like this.
In 1989 the Japanese government passed the Media Betterment Act to censor media that the Japanese government considered to be harmful to Japanese society, and allowed the Media Betterment Committee to act against organisations and individuals that are trying to exercise their rights under the Statement on Intellectual Freedom that went into effect in 1954 (amended in 1979).
However local governments opposed the MBA/MBC and established armed anti-MBA defense forces to protect libraries from being raided by the MBC.
The year is now 2019 and the story follows a young recruit into the anti-MBA defense forces as she battles to protect libraries from censorship.
Congress: "Yeah whatever, do what the orange guy says."
Mr. Bookman would be proud.