She is a different version of Obama in his eyes and he already tried all the racism and it didn't work. It's fun to watch him squirm.
this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
103 points (94.0% liked)
politics
19120 readers
2624 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Don't let your guard down. We still have to get so far past the finish line that SCROTUS can't pull another Al Gore.
That said, I'm quite enjoying watching him squirm as well
I'm less concerned about the SC and more concerned with random acts terrorism that will come with a decisive loss. They will only hear the case if it's close and sometimes it seems like Trump is trying to lose.
I'm concerned with how there are about three different terrifyingly-viable ways for Trump to end up with the Presidency that don't involve getting ≥270 Electoral College votes.
- Bush v. Gore 2.0
- Jan 6 2.0
- Having MAGAs disrupt vote certifications in enough states that neither candidate gets to 270 and the election is thrown to a "one state, one vote" poll in the House.
Mr. Gore's name being split on to two different lines for me made me read it as "Artificial Intelligence Gore."
An Inconvenient Truth 2.0
She's definitely not Obama. Her weakness is policy. She has intentionally avoided the topic because she would undoubtedly alienate some of that "joy" that they're doing so well courting.
Thing is, the GOP in general is extremely weak on policy. And Trump is the worst of the bunch.
So she's probably good, unless the GOP can somehow make her define her stance in certain terms. Which she has always avoided like the plague in the past.
Agreed, she is vague now. I liked her better when she defined things:
https://kamalaharris.medium.com/my-plan-for-medicare-for-all-7730370dd421
The whole point of picking J.D. Vance was to counter Harris. Now that she's top of ticket, not only does Trump not know what to do, Vance is pointless against Walz.
The Vance pick had nothing to do with the campaign. When Trump picked Vance he thought that he was guaranteed a victory. He picked Vance to ingratiate himself with Silicon Valley during his Presidency.
Trump picked Vance because he has an Indian wife and could counter a Harris VP with "I'm not racist, look who I married!"
That got blown up when Harris was elevated and going against Trump.
But he doesn't counter Harris at all.
It's just more Trump. A counter would have been Nikki Haley, but that darn misogyny got in the way.
Trump picked Vance because he has an Indian wife and could counter a Harris VP with "I'm not racist, look who I married!"
That got blown up when Harris was elevated and going against Trump.
No. Vance said these magic words:
"I would not have certified the 2020 election."
That's all it took.
It's only a matter of time before they just start calling her the n word. 🤷♂️
What a nasty woman....
One option is to fuck himself in the ass with a bicycle.
There are so many things he can go fuck himself with.
Seems like a waste of a good bicycle. He should fuck himself in the ass with a worthless car instead.
I'm on board with this approach. If I may suggest an additional step - perform a quarter turn on the vertical axis after insertion.
Its so nice not having to think about Biden in this election.
Who?
He’s the guy that continues to approve arms shipments to Israel. Not a good guy
It's more than a month ago Biden stepped aside and trump is still out of ideas. Guess he is still working on that infrastructure bill.
The Hill - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Hill:
MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4849596-trump-harris-debate-unsure/