this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
462 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19148 readers
2007 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
462
Tim Walz's gay & bisexual former students praise his life-changing guidance (www.lgbtqnation.com)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

In 1999, Walz was a teacher and founded his high school's first gay-straight alliance. His old GSA students still remember him warmly.

Minnesota Gov. and Vice President hopeful Tim Walz (D) inspired generations of students during his time as a founder of the Gay-Straight Alliance (GSA) at the Mankato West High School in Minnesota. Now, some of his former GSA students are coming back to discuss all the ways in which Walz, as well as his wife Gwen, helped them personally.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 68 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Getting Harris and Walz elected will do more for the children of this country than any other single thing. Mostly because it will enable so much more support of all American children than would be possible if Donald & James are elected.

We still need more proportional representation and ranked-choice (or similar) voting to secure this support, but none of that will be possible if Harris and Walz are defeated.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I assume JD Vance hates children that have not contributed to America by having their own children.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Given the broad support of abolishing or lowering ages of eligibility for marriage amongst Republican politicians, I would say the chances of that are extremely high, yes.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Everyone who wants to bring child marriage back should be put in a dumpster and fired at the sun.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I just wanted to say that I appreciate you using the more economically efficient (and scientifically realistic) phrasing. Firing someone at the sun has low specificity, is easily attainable, and generally effective. Firing someone into the sun is incredibly difficult and expensive. Normally I'm not a fan of half-assing things, but in this specific case it makes so much more sense to just approximate and let physics and biology meet in the middle.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Let gravity do the work!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

You've got my vote

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Once the election is over, we should try to channel this enthusiasm and energy into supporting ranked choice initiatives. It's our only hope! https://fairvote.org/ Post other initiatives if you know about them 🙂

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago

Goddamn. I fucking love this dude.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I always liked the bit from Robin Williams in the movie "Dead Again".

"Decide who you are and then be that."

In that case, he was talking to a smoker driving themselves crazy trying to quit smoking. You either are, or you aren't. Decide who you are and then be that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

That sounds a lot like advice I read in some book (maybe Atomic Habits?). What I remember of the point was that your habits will follow your identity. If you’re a “former smoker,” you’re a small step away from becoming a smoker again. If you’re “not a smoker,” you have to consciously defy your identity to pick up cigarettes again, and it is hard for people to change their foundational perceptions of their identity.

I thought it an interesting premise. It seems in some ways opposite to the guidance of Alcoholics Anonymous, which as I understand it is that everyone there identifies as an alcoholic, no matter how long it’s been since they imbibed. That’s supposed to keep them conscious of the choice to not drink (though it might also be intentional to drive the community mindset and participation that’s also foundational to AA…)

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 months ago

LGBTQ Nation - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for LGBTQ Nation:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.lgbtqnation.com/2024/08/tim-walz-is-an-ally-for-lgbtq-rights-you-need-to-know-about/
https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2024/08/tim-walzs-gay-bisexual-gsa-students-praise-his-life-changing-guidance/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support