Memes

45755 readers

1018 users here now

Rules:

Be civil and nice.
Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

741

Pragernant (lemmy.world)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

61 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Wouldn't it also be greater than 1 for the same reason as OP? I think there are probably more babies in mothers than people missing testes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

but mothers don't have testicles

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

Not their own, no, but the average number of testicles in a mother's body is greater than 0.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But they have the testicles of their soon to be born sons.

I would say whether it's greater than 1 or lesser than 1 is inconclusive without accurate data .

You would need to find out whether amount of men with removed testicles is greater than amount of women pregnant with a boy (after the average week when testicles appear). Also men to women ratio in global population needs to be accounted for.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

That's easy. The number of men missing testicles is not 50%