view the rest of the comments
Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
Polymarket is much more complicated than you expect, because you can make money while making the “wrong” bet. The best way to understand it is to try it out with your friends. Have one person watch the murder mystery, and then create a stack of a few “bets” for each suspect, worth $10, $30, $50, $75, $100. Each of these shares pays the same at the end of the game, say $120, if the suspect is revealed to be the murderer. Give each of your friend $150 in Monopoly money. Players can buy a share at any time from the bank or from each other at any point for any price. The person with the most money at the end wins!
As you play, you’ll notice you can make money by trading bets. Right now, it looks like the butler did it, so if you’re heavily invested in the butler you can sell those shares while they’re high, and buy the tennis coach. Next time the narrative of the movie shifts, you can sell the tennis coach and buy the spouse. You can even win the game without ever successfully guessing whodunnit.
Polymarket is like this. There are propositions, and you can buy shares based on a current price. Based on the price of the shares relative to each other, you can mathematically work out the probability the market believes something has of happening. It’s like gambling, but more complicated, so you’re much less likely to actually make any money off it unless you’re really steeped in economics and markets. Notably, Polymarket arose out of work by economists who proposed it as an alternative to voting that would allow richer people to vote more, and poorer people to vote less.
Man this is an excellent description.
I do want to add, there's no telling that one of your friends hasn't seen this movie previously and is acting with inside information.
I think what's particularly pernicious is the ability to monetarily reward people who understand the shape of the narrative without being close enough to decision makers to understand the intended outcomes.
You're also competing against people with insider knowledge (depending on what you are betting on) which currently isn't illegal AFAICT.
Not only is it not illegal, it's a feature of the system, since it allows the market to reveal insider information without breaking confidence. The folks who advocate in favor of prediction markets identify this ability to use the market to reveal insider information as a benefit of the system, and argue that allowing "super predictors" (insiders and rich people, by and large) to profit as a result is the cost we pay for getting the insider information as a signal from the price.