344
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by LuminousLuddite@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

"Republicans are once again attempting to make Daylight Saving Time permanent, with President Donald Trump promising to lead the push to end the longstanding American practice of switching clocks twice a year."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] user_name@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Every health and safety expert who isn’t the Chamber of Commerce hoping for longer shopping hours agrees that permenant Standard Time would be superior and that permenant DST would be, in fact, deadly.

Also we did permenant DST and hated it. We just hated it so much we abolished it immediately and promptly forgot we ever tried it.

Big agree with this. Permanently DST sucks, and we have historical basis for that claim. Anyone above a certain latitude is going to loathe this change any anyone southern enough to not feel as much of the earths tilt wont notice much of a difference. Depending how far east you are in your timezone will change how it effects you too.

[-] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago

but people who are in the far east are much more likely to be affluent or have (local) state-sponsored means to help them see in the morning. plus we have mobile flashlights now

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Being on the far east end of a time zone sucks in the winter. I suspect longitude is a bigger factor than latitude.

When I look at how far east the Maritimes of Canada go I'm not surprised they use a half hour timezone, if anything I'm just surprised they didn't just adopt the full hour earlier. If you go just about straight north from St. John's you'll end up in a part of Greenland that does use the full hour earlier.

[-] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 day ago

How is this possible? No matter what number you call it the day stays the same. This is so stupid.

[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Permanent DST is equivalent to permanent standard time with business hours moved an hour earlier. I assume that standard business hours were originally set by businesses to maximize profits—so if permanent earlier hours are better for business than permanent standard hours, why didn’t businesses set earlier hours to begin with?

[-] angrystego@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The optimum may shift over time.

[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

There’s nothing preventing businesses from changing their hours over time as well (and in the long run, I suspect they’ll eventually settle on the same physical hours regardless of whether we choose standard time or permanent DST).

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm still hugely in favor of a permanent dlst. It fucking sucks to be dark as hell before you even get home from a normal work day. If you're going to cage the public till 5pm, at least give the opportunity at a brief bit of light.

[-] bss03@infosec.pub 8 points 1 day ago

It fucking sucks to be dark as hell before you even get home from a normal work day.

The solution for that is adjusting working hours, not the clocks.

Noon should always be the hour nearest the sun's peak.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That means you'd have to adjust the clock all the time. End of October for instance, we're on "normal time" but high noon is almost 1 pm. Not 12.

[-] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

People didn't hate it, they were given propaganda and then they hated it. Because people are morons.

this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
344 points (99.1% liked)

News

37724 readers
2934 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS