25
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Lemmchen@feddit.org to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

Recently I've installed luci-app-banip on my OpenWrt router and blocked most countries from accessing my services on my network. Not seeing why I would want any of that traffic I also blocked the whole of the ARIN registry, responsible for IP addresses from Canada and the United States.
Edit: Note this is only for inbound traffic. Outbound traffic is allowed no matter the target country.

Fast forward a few weeks and my certbot renewals fail with the following error: Failed to renew certificate enter.domain.here with error: HTTPSConnectionPool(host='acme-v02.api.letsencrypt.org', port=443): Read timed out. (read timeout=45)

Confused af I start looking for solutions and as so often only find useless or completely ridiulous solutions (lowering my MTU to 1300, what? WHY?). Finally I find some enlighted figure that says they recently enabled a blocklist for certain countries and that was the issue for them.
Now I make the connection to my use of banIP, re-allow the USA and my cert renewals start working again. Hooray!

However, there are two things bothering me:

  1. Why would such a block even interrupt my renewals? I'm using DNS challenges and the ACME servers should only check the DNS entries, not where those entries actually redirect to. The DNS server/root isn't in my home network, so isn't affected by any firewall shenanigans I do here.
  2. How can I make an exception for the Let's Encrypt ACME servers while blocking the rest of the ARIN IP space?

I see there's the option for ASN selection and external allowlists:

Does anybody have an idea on how to configure this so that Let's Encrypt continues to work without compromising on my network security?

(Edit: And just for clarity, I do not live in the US or anywhere on the American continent.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 2 points 1 week ago

Firewalls are typically built using 'in' rules, but it's not referring to 'wan > lan' but rather if the rule is processed on the ingress of the firewall or the egress.

Stateful firewalls sessions are always going to allow responses, the old request that someone needs a rule 'both directions' is something of a running joke at this point honestly.

A pcap would explain a lot, the fact that the error cites a specific domain does sound like an outbound attempt, but if it was a specifically inbound region block that wouldn't add up.

this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
25 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

59393 readers
2118 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS