89
submitted 5 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 29 points 5 days ago

Yeah, solarpunk is obviously a reactionary aesthetic. You can read the manifestos of its popularizers and very clearly see the class position of the art movement. How is lionizing the artisan and other middle classes, a reduction in productive capacity, and its desire to revive dead art styles outside of their historical context not reactionary? Stop with the solarpunk and "degrowth" and read more Soviet sci-fi and Chinese five-year plans.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 5 days ago

whats wrong with degrowth? solely educational question if you feel like replying

[-] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It depends a lot on the context. Degrowth in the imperial core? Sure. In the periphery? Hell nah

There was a relatively recent study about the responsibility about climate change that puts the ratio between north / south countries at 9:1, see https://globalinequality.org/responsibility-for-climate-breakdown/ for further references.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
89 points (91.6% liked)

chapotraphouse

13935 readers
645 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS