xkcd #3101: Good Science

Title text:

If you think curiosity without rigor is bad, you should see rigor without curiosity.

Transcript:

[Miss Lenhart is standing in front of a whiteboard with some scribbles on it.]
Miss Lenhart: I'm supposed to give you the tools to do good science.

[Miss Lenhart is now standing in front of Jill and Cueball, who are seated at classroom desks.]
Miss Lenhart: But what are those tools?
Miss Lenhart: Methodology is hard and there are so many ways to get incorrect results.
Miss Lenhart: What is the magic ingredient that makes for good science?

[Miss Lenhart headshot.]
Miss Lenhart: To figure it out, I ran a regression with all the factors people say are important:
[A list, presented in a sub-panel that Miss Lenhart is pointing to:]
Outcome variable:

• correct scientific results

Predictors:

• collaboration
• skepticism of others' claims
• questioning your own beliefs
• trying to falsify hypotheses
• checking citations
• statistical rigor
• blinded analysis
• financial disclosure
• open data
  [presumably the list goes on, as it runs off the visible part of the panel]

[Another Miss Lenhart headshot.]
Miss Lenhart: The regression says two ingredients are the most crucial:

1. genuine curiosity about the answer to a question, and
2. ammonium hydroxide

[Miss Lenhart, standing, and Jill, seated at desk]
Jill: Wait, why did ammonia score so high? How did it even get on the list?
Miss Lenhart: ...and now you're doing good science!

Source: https://xkcd.com/3101/

explainxkcd for #3101