this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
192 points (83.1% liked)

World News

32349 readers
768 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Viewers are divided over whether the film should have shown Japanese victims of the weapon created by physicist Robert Oppenheimer. Experts say it's complicated.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not germane to the plot at all as the film is about him as a character and his experience, not about the bombing or the war more generally. His realisation of the distance he has from his victims and how he's been forced out the loop once the bombs were finished is crucial to his arc in the later part of the film.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

His realisation of the distance he has from his victims

Yes... And the effect his weapon had on them isn't relevant?

He is literally known for saying "now I am become death destroyer of worlds" and you don't think showing that death is germane to the plot?

I'm not saying it should have been in the movie but it's not "whataboutism" to say that it could have been. Unless you don't know what whataboutism is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and you don’t think showing that death is germane to the plot?

Correct. It is not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You don't think the victims of the weapon he created are relevant to a story about his life??? I can't even. Either way saying it is is not whataboutism which is my point anyway.