this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
87 points (96.8% liked)

UK Politics

3111 readers
301 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (24 children)

I never realised how much people want to be controlled by the government when I was younger.

This is fucked.

"But the government wants to ban something I don't like! That's good. They should stop others doing things I don't like!"

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (13 children)

Yes, blame the government for wanting to protect people’s health.

Absolutely trust the smokers who are clearly capable of making the correct descision instead.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (12 children)

There an element of personal freedom which people find important.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When you smoke its not just your own health you ruin. It's the same selfish thinking antivaxers have.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That's not a terrible analogy, but doesn't resounding support a ban. It's virtually unimaginable (and I suspect more or less legally impossible) that vaccination would be obligatory.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Even though it has been in the past, and lead to the eradication of small pox.

And should be again to help eradicate measles, polio and many other very harmful, but easily preventable diseases.

But let’s not go there. I suspect there’s more of them than smokers, but quite a large overlap on a Venn diagram.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah, what was legal/feasible 100 years ago might not be the best guide today. I mean no reasonable person would deny it would be better for public health.

That’s actually an interesting question. All the people I know who still smoke are left leaning and probably pro vaccine. I guess I don't know many of the main smoking population (older lower socioeconomic status) so maybe there there's more than coincidental overlap. It would be coherent I guess for the freedom over everything type people I suppose, depressingly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Vaccination in the past has been obligatory, eg for polio.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

So has lobotomy for certain mental health patients. What's your point?

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)