this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
1197 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19148 readers
2047 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago (24 children)

We also rate [LGBTQ Nation] Mostly Factual in reporting, rather than High, due to not labeling opinion pieces, which may mislead the reader

Failed Fact Checks: None in the Last 5 years

lol, dude who makes up these ratings can get absolutely fucked for expecting an LGBTQ news website to fucking both sides LGBTQ rights.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (21 children)

This rating is not "expecting" anything. This assessment is accurate, it IS left leaning and mostly factual, with unlabeled opinion pieces... What is the problem with identifying that? All news sites are biased, it's just how it is

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (20 children)

Rating it as though they’ve published something that is untrue (what the average person expects from a factuality rating) when they explicitly haven’t failed fact checks is stupid AF.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Just because an opinion piece doesn't fail a fact-check doesn't mean it's not an opinion piece, and it should be labeled as such

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So factor that into the bias rating, not the factuality rating, because that is about bias and not whether or not they have published things that are untrue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Presenting an opinion as fact (such as not labeling opinion pieces) would be a factuality issue no?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Presenting things that are untrue is a factuality issue. You are describing bias.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So you're saying I'm right because an opinion is an opinion and not true or untrue. Presenting an opinion as either is a factuality issue.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

So you're saying I'm right because an opinion is an opinion and not true or untrue.

If it’s not untrue then it shouldn’t affect the factuality rating, not sure why this is hard to get.

Incidentally as another user pointed out in this thread, LGBTQ Nation does label their opinion pieces as such. Until MBFC presents evidence otherwise, I’m going to conclude that what they have deemed “undisclosed opinions” are things like “trans kids exist and deserve protection”.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Did you not see the screenshot that was posted? It is labeled.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)